|
A Photography Primer
Our Experience
We met the first photographer (recommended by the Inn) at the Inn, and he basically went into a little sales pitch right away. He was very nice, but we were immediately turned off by the pictures, which seemed to be standard wedding fare, and by his definite views on wedding photography (which didn't match ours). Of course, his price was very reasonable -- but we couldn't bring ourselves to hire him. As we were leaving the Inn, he pointed out that some of the photos on the walls were his. They were stunning shots, all stills, of natural subjects (trees, frogs, flowers), and it seemed clear that his heart was in those photos while the money was in wedding photography. The second photographer, Maureen Edwards DeFries, met us at our apartment. She didn't jump into telling us all about herself, but just suggested that we look at the albums she'd brought (she had about six with her), and sat there quietly while we gazed at her beautiful photographs, oohing and ahhing along the way. She told us that she always brought an assistant with her -- the assistant would take pictures of Jim getting ready while Maureen would take pictures of me getting ready, the assistant would help set up formal shots, and would provide additional coverage, mainly taking color shots while Maureen took black and white pictures. She usually shoots for 7-8 hours, and takes 700-800 exposures. She follows the style of the wedding, and doesn't intrude in any way -- in fact, she told us she'd want us to forget she was there. She uses a mixture of black and white and color, 35mm and medium format, leaning more heavily toward candid black and white 35mm shots. She brings enough film with her to photograph three weddings, and brings about five or six different cameras. She said she would be there if she broke her leg or had any other minor catastrophe -- the only way she wouldn't make it was if she was in the hospital -- in which case she does have backup photographers she could call. She was very nice, told us we were really cute together, and said she'd love to photograph our wedding. Of course, she was three times more expensive than the first (though not more expensive than the photographer Jim's parents had found), and of course we wanted her anyway. After seriously considering how important the pictures were to us and thinking about what else we could scale back, we decided to book Maureen. I recommend reading up on photography
before interviewing photographers -- most wedding planning books at
least go over the basics, which is all you need to know. The great
thing about determining the type of photography you want is that you
can weed people out over the phone if they don't match your criteria
and only meet with the most promising candidates.
There are also many styles of wedding
photography, and you'll want to find a photographer whose style fits
well with yours. For example, standard wedding photographers
generally use only medium format cameras, which results in many
beautiful posed and special effects shots. However, you may not get
many pictures of people looking natural, and sometimes these
photographers tend to be a bit pushy and to orchestrate the event
rather than simply filming it. The journalistic photographer,
on the other hand, tends to use 35mm, lots of black and white film,
and likes to hang back and watch the action unfold, documenting
exactly what happens on the wedding day rather than trying to control
events. An artistic photographer looks for a beautiful and/or
artistic shot above all else (he or she may be less concerned with a
photograph of the smiling bride and groom than with the way the light
catches someone's face). Really, there are as many styles as there are
photographers, and many photographers blend a bit of each style into
their work.
Questions to Ask Potential Photographers
|
||